← Back to workStudio concept · 2026

Penmark Roofing

A concept brief for a premium UK roofing trade selling itself to architects and listed-building owners. Built end-to-end to show the work — live client work shown on request.

Year
2026
Role
Concept · Design + Build
  • Portfolio
  • Trade
  • Interactive
The brief

Penmark is a concept brief for an eleven-strong roofing crew based outside Cirencester — pitched tile, natural slate, lead and zinc detail, warm flat extensions, working on listed homes and parish buildings across the Cotswolds. The category problem: roofers' sites are gallery-walls of finished photos that say nothing about what's actually under the tile. The brief: a site that an architect can spec from, that shows the system not just the surface, and that filters past tyre-kickers before the phone rings.

Live site
penmarkroofing.co.uk
Open ↗
View the full siteOpens in a new tab
Get architects onto the call sheet. Filter out the tyre-kickers.
From the brief
Design decisions

The four specific calls that defined this build.

Show the system, not the surface

Every roofer's homepage is a photo of a finished roof. Penmark leads with an interactive scroll-driven cross-section that dismantles the roof as you scroll — clay, batten, membrane, rafter, insulation — each layer named and specced. Architects can see how the firm thinks before they pick up the phone.

Lead times stated, in weeks

Most premium trades quietly hide their lead times. Penmark states them on the homepage: '9 weeks. Foreman picks up.' Filters out clients who need next Tuesday, signals confidence about the queue.

Accreditations on the page, not in the footer

NFRC, CompetentRoofer, TrustMark, insurance — most sites bury these on an 'About' page nobody reads. Penmark runs them as a single-line strip above the call-to-action, where they actually do the trust work.

Survey form, not contact form

Standard contact forms get spam. The Penmark enquiry asks for the address, the building age, the suspected problem, and the access constraints. Real surveys go on the schedule; cold leads drop out.

The stack

Every tool chosen on purpose, with a reason that beat the obvious alternative.

Framework
Next.js App Router (SSG + ISR)

Project case-study pages stay fast as the portfolio grows. ISR on the index revalidates when a finished job lands.

Hero animation
Framer Motion + scroll-linked transforms

The exploded-roof hero is the whole differentiator. Built with useScroll + per-layer useTransform on inline SVG — no canvas, no video, no surprise weight.

CMS
Sanity Studio

Foreman writes new project entries from site after a finished job. Three fields plus a body block — nothing nobody fills in.

Lead routing
Formspark + Notion + SMS

Survey requests drop into a Notion board, an SMS pings the foreman if marked 'emergency'. No CRM overhead.

Hosting
Vercel

Git-driven deploys. Office edits go through PRs the developer reviews.

Analytics
Plausible

Cookie-free, dashboard fits on one screen. Tracks which projects pull the most architect time.

What success looks like

The numbers a real engagement would be scored on.

+45%
Target · architect-led enquiries
<12%
Survey-to-quote drop rate
LCP <1.6s
On the explode-hero homepage

Like this for your business?

I'd start with the same brief on yours — built to the same standard, in 2–4 weeks.